Free group Q&A – 12:30pm Wed 2 Dec
Register here or click here to join

Missed an event? Watch here. 

If you’ve ever considered buying property through your Self-Managed Super Fund (SMSF), there are two important developments you should be aware of.

The first is a proposed Government plan to ban new SMSF loans used to purchase residential property. The second is the introduction of stronger Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorism Financing (CTF) requirements that will affect many financial and property-related transactions.

Importantly, these are not the same thing.

The proposed ban on residential property borrowing through SMSFs has not yet become law. While the Federal Government has announced an agreement with the Greens, legislation still needs to be introduced and passed by Parliament before any changes take effect.

The AML/CTF reforms, however, are progressing separately and are expected to increase compliance requirements for SMSFs and property transactions regardless of whether the proposed borrowing ban proceeds.

What Is an LRBA?

An LRBA (Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangement) is a loan that allows an SMSF to borrow money to buy a property. 

For example, rather than waiting until your SMSF has enough money to purchase a property outright, the fund may contribute a deposit and borrow the remainder from a lender.

Many Australians have used LRBAs to purchase residential or commercial property within their super fund as part of their long-term retirement strategy.

What Is the Government Proposing?

Under the proposed deal with the Greens, the Government intends to ban new LRBAs used to purchase residential property within an SMSF.

However, this proposal has not yet been legislated. Before any changes can occur, legislation must be drafted, introduced to Parliament and successfully passed. 

If the proposal eventually becomes law:

  • New SMSF loans for residential property would no longer be permitted.
  • Existing borrowing arrangements are expected to be grandfathered and remain unaffected.
  • Commercial property borrowing may continue, although the final details would depend on the legislation.

 

The proposal has attracted immediate and strong criticism from many SMSF industry groups, who argue that SMSF borrowing makes up only a small part of the property market and has not been shown to create significant risks for the broader superannuation system.

Where Things Stand Today

At the time of writing:

  • SMSFs can still borrow to purchase residential and commercial property using an LRBA.
  • No legislation banning new residential property LRBAs has been passed.
  • Existing LRBAs are expected to be protected if the proposal eventually becomes law.
  • The AML/CTF reforms are progressing separately and are expected to increase compliance requirements regardless of whether the LRBA proposal proceeds.

For now, SMSF trustees should focus on the current rules while keeping an eye on future developments.

What Are the New AML/CTF Changes?

Australia is strengthening its Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing framework to help prevent criminal activity and improve transparency across the financial system.

While these reforms are not specifically targeted at SMSFs, they are expected to affect many financial transactions involving superannuation funds, property purchases and borrowing arrangements.

As advisers, accountants, lawyers and property professionals adjust to the new requirements, SMSF trustees may notice:

  • More identity verification checks.
  • Additional documentation requests.
  • Greater scrutiny of where funds originate.
  • Longer processing times for property purchases and loan applications.
  • Increased compliance requirements from service providers.

These changes are intended to improve the integrity of Australia’s financial system, but they may also make SMSF property transactions more administratively complex than they have been in the past.

What Does This Mean for SMSF Investors?

The combination of a possible future LRBA ban and increased AML compliance requirements means SMSF property investing is becoming more heavily regulated.

For trustees who already have an LRBA in place, there is currently no indication that existing arrangements will be affected.

For those considering purchasing property through an SMSF in the future, it is important to understand that while borrowing remains available today, future opportunities could become more limited if the proposed legislation proceeds.

At the same time, increased compliance obligations are likely to become a permanent part of the process.

Our View

Property continues to be an important investment option for many SMSF trustees, whether for wealth creation, diversification or the acquisition of business premises through superannuation.

While the proposed residential LRBA ban remains uncertain until legislation is introduced and passed, the direction of travel is clear: SMSF trustees should expect greater scrutiny, more documentation and a stronger compliance focus in the years ahead.

For anyone considering an SMSF property purchase or borrowing arrangement, obtaining advice early and understanding the changing rules will be more important than ever.

FreedomFFS will continue monitoring these developments and provide updates as further information becomes available.